Feeds:
Posts
Comments

www.huntswood.comConsumercred

A major change in consumer credit regulation is coming, affecting approximately £260 billion in outstanding credit and approximately 50,000 firms, and that is without counting bank lenders whose distribution or direct services will be affected. The market’s current regulator, the Office of Fair Trading (OFT), will be disbanded in 12 months, its statutory underpinning will move from the Consumer Credit Act to the Financial Services and Markets Act and, finally, regulatory responsibility will move to the Financial Conduct Authority (FCA) from April 2014. No mean feat.

Consumer credit firms will not have much time to get used to their new regulator given the short timetable until the OFT is disbanded. There will, however, be a phased approach to the transfer: an interim period starting in April 2014 with full implementation by April 2016. The high level timeline can be found here.

Martin Wheatley has his eye on this market, stating:

“Consumer credit inhabits every corner of our day to day financial lives. It is a broad church spanning everything from overdrafts to hire purchase to credit cards to debt advice, provided by tens of thousands of firms of all shapes and sizes. We will focus our efforts on the areas of highest risk…[we] will give consumers the protection they  expect without placing an undue burden on the firms that service them.”

The consumer credit landscape is indeed wide given the inclusion of firms receiving continuous payments such as gyms. The Treasury has quipped, however, that dating agencies will not come under the FCA’s regulation. Not just yet, anyway.

Regulatory focus will be on payday lenders, pawnbrokers, credit reference agencies and debt collection, given their higher risk to consumers. Credit broking will also be targeted, e.g. those retailers and motor dealers introducing customers to lenders. Firms’ differing risk categories will impact which authorisation procedure is appropriate: limited or full.

There remain questions about the impact this change will have. What is certain is that the FCA will have its full suite of powers available including product intervention and redress for consumers. In most cases, the FCA will require higher standards than the OFT but the strict liability and criminal offences under the Consumer Credit Act will be no more. For the first time, however, the power to put a cap on interest rates will apply.

Prior to new rules being published in September 2013, firms should focus on the following:

  • Alignment to the FCA handbook within PRIN, GEN and SYSC (as outlined in CP13/7)
  • Firms’ plan for the authorisation process
  • Approved persons: who should be appointed?
  • How robust are your financial promotions? The supervision of credit advertising will be subject to the FSMA financial promotions regime, alongside existing credit promotions
  • The monitoring of OFT provisions, guidelines and recommendations for changes in interpretation as they transfer to the FCA handbook

In anticipation of the new rules and regulation – look out for a Consumer Credit Conduct of Business Sourcebook (possibly CCCOBS) – proactive work should be undertaken by firms new to the FCA.

Register for the monthly UK retail conduct risk newsletter

Join the UK retail conduct risk group on Linkedin

Watch and join the conversation on Twitter

Send your questions, comments and views to askhuntswood@huntswood.com

www.huntswood.comRisk

This is an abridged version of Paul Scott’s speech given at the BBA Financial incentive briefing 16th April 2013. Paul Scott is the director of Advisory Services at Huntswood.

In its financial incentives paper, the Financial Services Authority (FSA) found that many firms did not properly identify how their incentive schemes might encourage staff to mis-sell. The regulator even went as far as to say that firms had not sufficiently thought about the risks or turned a blind eye. The Financial Conduct Authority (FCA) requires firms to fully consider if their incentive schemes increase the risk of mis-selling and make changes accordingly.

The FCA’s position in relation to incentives and mis-selling is clear: incentivising staff to sell is not in itself a bad thing. Incentive schemes become problematic when they increase the risk of mis-selling. If firms assess their schemes and draw this conclusion, the schemes should be removed. Firms should consider all incentive risks arising in the light of their risk appetite – and the regulator’s Continue Reading »

www.huntswood.comMICE2013image

6th of November: hold the date! The Council of Mortgage Lenders’ 2013 mortgage industry conference and exhibition (MICE) is set to be another thought provoking event. With the mortgage industry “open for business” this signals positive news for lenders, customers and the economy. Being “open for business” also brings with it the challenge of balancing the increasingly busy shop front and the back office: managing and preparing for rising regulatory standards Continue Reading »

www.huntswood.comFSAtoFCA

Welcome to the new regulatory era. The Financial Conduct Authority (FCA) is certainly keeping its promise to be more proactive and intrusive, making its presence known across the industry through demanding thematic reviews and requests for information. There is, however, a more subtle change in the FCA’s approach, detectable through its publications.

After the flurry of documents at the beginning of the month, the relative lull for now gives the industry a chance to digest the risk outlook and business plan 2013-2014 – and digest it should. These key documents take a new approach Continue Reading »

www.huntswood.comProd_poll

The Financial Conduct Authority did not fight this hard for its temporary product intervention powers simply to leave them in the tool box – unused. That we know. What remains unknown is where and when the new powers will be used.

What do you think?

Join the poll here.

Register for the monthly UK retail conduct risk newsletter

Join the UK retail conduct risk group on Linkedin

Watch and join the conversation on Twitter

Send your questions, comments and views to askhuntswood@huntswood.com

www.huntswood.com/recruitment

Almost everyone had a reason to be shocked by the horse meat scandal. Some were outraged on religious grounds, personal or even commercial reasons. There were, of course, those who saw the lighter side of the situation.

Whatever your stance, we all learnt two things: 1) the length and complexity of the supply chain from the animal in the field to the food on the plate 2) there is a need for more effective controls within this chain. Confirming this, a survey carried out by SCM World found that “only a quarter of respondents said they currently have good visibility of sustainability performance in their supply chain networks.”

Although the majority of press coverage focused on Tesco, to understand the issue fully we must look further back in the supply chain. There were numerous suppliers deemed to have supplied contaminated meat products. Continue Reading »

www.huntswood.com/recruitment

How often have you heard sensational stats like ‘500 applicants per job’? Since the beginning of the economic crisis stories like this have continued to gain attention in the media and I don’t doubt that the majority of cases are true. The thing that concerns me is that the media has spun these figures in such a way that it appears as though nobody has a hope of landing a job because there are 499 other people applying who are just as good. This is just simply not true.

In recruitment it is a fundamental part of any candidate search to post advertisements that will attract the right calibre of candidate for our clients. Unfortunately, the vast majority of applicants aren’t even close to acceptable. I don’t want to knock people for having a go but any job hunter needs to understand and work within their limitations. Continue Reading »

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 99 other followers